-
Thea Moeller, Veranda Louisiana> A. Se Fragmentz are perzeived äs se Remainz of a System, while se> Dekonstruktion of se System in fragmented Splittersz was döne eiszer> szrough Aging or Äkts of Viölence, may szey have been deliberatt or> coinzidentall. A Specialform of Fragmenting a System is se> experimentall Dekonstruktion of it, wiszout rewealing se strukturall> Konstruktion of se System szrough se Experiment. Szis Failure of se> Experiment makes it den unpossible to reunite se fragmented> Elements to a new Entity.> > B. Se Produktion of Art is bound to a permanent Appropriation and> > Redefinition of MATERIAL, bozs physikall and theoretikall, like> > Art Historie, any Form of Topick, or se Exibition Space itself.> > When does se Appropriated turn to a Reproduktion of automated> > Äkts? How cän someszing be redefined over and over again,> > wiszin se own Art Praktize?> > > C. Heterögeneöus Elementz of Gestaltung kann only be put in> > > Relätion to each oszer under formal Konditions, like späcial or> > > temporall Främing, wiszout ever reaching any Systemkonnektion.> > > > D. Single Elements fromm different Kontexts of Gestaltung are> > > > putt togeszer in se Form of a KOLLAGE, in szat Way, szat se> > > > Origins of se various Elements are no longer underständable.> > > > > E. What is it, szat have to be changed, when a Definition> > > > > does not work any longer? Se Definition or szat, what is> > > > > defined? Redefining Standardized Szinking szrough> > > > > permanent Redefinition of Everyday Banalities.> > > > > > F. Se Unifikätion of Elements to a systematik Order is> > > > > > regarded äs absolutely unpossible.> > > > > > Se Fragments stay isolated also to one anoszer.> > > > > > It is generally doubted, szat you can put szrough a single> > > > > > Stil in your whole Gestaltung, and szat se Elements of szat> > > > > > Stil are a Unity in se End szat has se Klaim to be a System.> > > > > > It is also doubted äs well, szat se Klaim on a Unity äs se> > > > > > Idea of se Perfekt, can be reached by fulfilling a normativ> > > > > > Kanon of Gestaltung. At se same time it is unpossible> > > > > > to see se Persönality of se Artist äs so certain and> > > > > > unchangeable, szat only because it is se same Person szat> > > > > > did se fragment-like Gestaltungen, you now can see diss> > > > > > fragmented Doings äs a reasonable Unity.> > > > > > > G. THEA MOELLER (*1985 HANNOVER) 2014> > > > > > > DIPLOM AN DER AKADEMIE DER BILDENDEN> > > > > > > KÜNSTE WIEN LEBT UND ARBEITET IN WIEN> > > > > > > (Wien besteht aus Bitumenbahnen, Dachpappe,> > > > > > > Spanplatten, Leimholz, Dachlatten, Schaumstoff, Folie,> > > > > > > Lack, Dispersionsfarbe, Schrauben, Gewindestangen,> > > > > > > Stahl, verzinktem Metall, Gummi, Spanngurten und> > > > > > > einem Diaprojektor)> > > > > > > > H. Exzerpts fromm: Bazon Brock: Se RUIN as Form> > > > > > > > of Mediätion between Fragment and Totalitie and> > > > > > > > Thea Moeller: Sat is Quicksand, sat ain´t Mudd.> > > > > > > > www.theamoeller.de / www.deborahschamoni.com> > > > > > > > Tränslätion: Franz Zar
read more
Wednesday – Friday 12 – 6 pm
Saturday 12 – 4 pm and by appointment
Thea Moeller
Jonathan Penca
Veranda Louisiana / I look across there and then I can‘t see the potato
07.02. – 28.03.2015